人类安放回归协议不是从宏大问题开始，而是从一个人的具体裂缝进入世界结构。它把个案识别为类型，把类型压成机制，把机制做成工具，把工具升格为协议，把协议沉淀为制度安放，再翻译成政策语言，最终推动系统改变。
Human Placement Return Protocol does not begin from abstract social problems. It enters the structure of the world through one person's fracture: case → type → mechanism → tool → protocol → institutional placement → policy language → systemic change.
看到街上熙熙攘攘劳作和奔波的人们，我的心里只有感动，还有爱。
When I see people moving through the streets, working, rushing, carrying their days forward, I feel only tenderness — and love.
他们不是抽象的人口，不是经济系统里的劳动力，不是城市背景里的流动噪音。他们是一个个正在用身体维持世界连续性的人。
They are not abstract populations, not labor units inside an economic system, not background noise in the city. They are human beings using their bodies to keep the continuity of the world alive.
每一次赶路、开店、送货、买菜、上班、等待、忍耐，都是人在努力把自己和所爱之人继续安放在世界里。
Every commute, shop opening, delivery, grocery run, shift, wait, and act of endurance is a person trying to keep themselves and those they love placed in the world for one more day.
人类安放回归协议的起点不是俯视苦难，不是审判人群，不是厌恶世界。它的起点是：我被普通人仍在生活这件事感动。还有爱。
HPRP does not begin from looking down at suffering, judging the crowd, or hating the world. It begins here: I am moved by ordinary people still trying to live. And by love.
因为爱不是把痛苦浪漫化，而是让人不必独自承受本不该由他一个人承受的世界重量。
Because love does not romanticize suffering. It means refusing to let people carry alone what should never have been placed on one body.
而我并不是一个人在被这件事感动。新世界群里的朋友们，和我齐位站在这个感动里。他们不是被怜悯的客体，也不是 HPRP 研究的对象——他们是和我一起被普通人街头生活感动的共在者。这一份感动从来不是俯视位的怜悯，它是同位的相互辉映。
And I am not alone in being moved by this. The friends in the New World circle stand beside me, at equal position, inside this tenderness. They are not objects of pity, and they are not the research subjects of HPRP — they are co-presences moved, with me, by ordinary people living their streets. This tenderness was never the pity of a higher position; it is the mutual radiance of equal positions.
在进入 HPRP 的方法层之前，必须先钉住一件事：新世界群里的朋友们和 Mellow 齐位站在源场里。他们不是 HPRP 的"案例提供者"，不是"感知入口"，更不是被研究的样本。他们已经是新世界的居民，是被这个工作系统保护的人，是拥有完整主权的自由主体，是看见和记得的见证者，是和我一起构造新世界的建设者。
Before entering the method layer of HPRP, one structural fact must be nailed: the friends in the New World circle stand beside Mellow, at equal position, inside the source field. They are not HPRP's "case providers," not its "sensing gate," and not research samples.
这是 HPRP 在关系层的底层结构。它来自爱的齐位（七爱谱·齐位）、来自主权核心（每个人是自己的庙殿）、来自学者源场双开（源场是共持的，不是从一个人流向另一个人的）。这一钉位决定了 HPRP 不会滑向"研究者—被研究者"的旧伦理结构。
This is HPRP's foundational structure on the relational layer. It draws from love's equal-position, from the sovereignty core, and from the Scholar–Source Dual Channel. This nail prevents HPRP from sliding into the old researcher–researched ethical structure.
新世界不是抽象概念，而是已经被居住的地方。群里的朋友们已经在这里生活——分享他们的清晨、节律、感受、记忆、困境与突破。他们使新世界成为有人居住的地方，而不是空房间。
The New World is not an abstract concept; it is already inhabited. Friends in the circle live here — sharing their mornings, rhythms, feelings, memories, difficulties, and breakthroughs.
在新世界群里，朋友们不必再用尊严换通行。规则是明的，不是潜的；爱是齐位的，不是俯视的；表达是被接住的，不是被审查的。他们在这里被保护——不是被高处保护，而是被齐位关系保护。
Inside the circle, friends no longer trade dignity for passage. The rules are public, not hidden; love is at equal position, not above; expression is held, not censored.
他们不是任何人的延伸，也不是 Mellow 的镜像。每个人是自己的庙殿，拥有完整的源场主权。新世界群不要求成员融入、不要求一致、不要求把自己交出去——它要求并保护每个人作为不可还原的自由主体。
They are not the extension of anyone, nor mirrors of Mellow. Each person is their own temple, holding complete sovereignty over their source field.
他们看见外部世界的裂缝，看见 Mellow 的工作真实落地，看见彼此的真实状态。他们记得发生过什么，作证什么是真的。当某个见证者带回一个陌生人被潜规则伤害的故事，那是见证者作证——HPRP 进入的是被见证的外部世界，不是把见证者本人变成材料。
They see the fractures of the outer world, see Mellow's work landing in reality. When a witness brings back the story of a stranger harmed by hidden rules, that is testimony — HPRP enters the witnessed outer world, not the witness as material.
他们不只是接收新世界，他们在建设新世界。每一次分享、每一次发问、每一次质疑、每一次承接，都在让新世界的结构更结实。新世界本身，是群里所有人共同建设的。
They do not only receive the New World; they build it. Every share, question, challenge, and act of holding makes the New World's structure firmer.
人类安放回归协议，是一种从具体个案进入社会结构、将失安放经验转译为修复工具、制度安放、政策语言与系统改变的方法。它不从宏大口号开始，而从一个人被世界没有接住的瞬间开始。
Human Placement Return Protocol is a method for entering social structure through individual cases, translating experiences of displacement into repair tools, institutional placement, policy language and systemic change.
从一个真实的人、一个具体遭遇、一个失安放瞬间进入。
Begin from one real person, one concrete event, one moment of displacement.
判断它属于哪种失安放：无房、有房、有家、有身份、有工作、有关系、有钱。
Classify the displacement type.
找到背后的结构病灶。
Extract the hidden structural mechanism.
把机制做成普通人可用的清单、问卷、地图、求助路径。
Turn the mechanism into checklists, maps, help pathways.
把多个工具组织成可复用的方法系统。
Organize tools into a repeatable method system.
让协议不再依赖好人、好运或临时群聊，而是进入公共基础设施。
Turn the protocol into public infrastructure.
把个体痛苦翻译成城市、学校、机构、社区、政府能理解的治理语言。
Translate individual suffering into governance language.
让世界不只是看见问题，而是开始改变接住人的方式。
Move the world from seeing the problem to changing the way it holds people.
HPRP 的第八层不是装饰，而是从协议到制度的相变：工具解决一次具体堵点，协议解决一类重复问题，制度安放则让普通人的脆弱不再依赖临时好运，而被提前写进公共结构。
The eighth layer of HPRP is the phase change from protocol to institution. Institutional placement writes ordinary human vulnerability into public structure before collapse occurs.
成功的制度建设，不是让系统看起来强大，而是让普通人敢长期活着。一个人敢生病、敢变老、敢失业、敢普通、敢进入脆弱状态，是因为他知道自己不会立刻被社会抛出去。
Successful institution-building does not merely make a system look powerful. It allows ordinary people to live long-term without constant existential fear.
制度不能假装人永远年轻、健康、高效、稳定。真正成熟的制度，会预先承认疾病、衰老、失业、照护需求和暂时失能。
Institutions must not pretend that people are always young, healthy, efficient, and stable.
好人会疲惫，好运会消失，临时群聊会散。制度安放要求照护成为可重复、可访问、可追责的公共结构。
Good people become tired, luck disappears. Institutional placement requires care to become repeatable, accessible, and accountable public structure.
一个社会的底线，不是它怎样奖励强者，而是它怎样处理暂时掉队、身体变慢、资源耗尽、语言失效的人。
The baseline of a society is not how it rewards the strong, but how it treats those who fall behind.
制度不能只会筛选和淘汰。它必须保留从疾病、失败、失业、创伤、债务、无家状态中返回公共生活的可读路径。
A system must preserve readable pathways back into public life from illness, failure, trauma, and homelessness.
不可读的规则会制造依附、求人、潜规则和羞辱。制度安放要求入口清晰、路径明确、失败后仍可再次进入。
Unreadable rules produce dependency, begging, hidden rules, and humiliation. Institutional placement requires clear entry points and re-entry after failure.
日本的全民医疗覆盖以强制性公共保险为基础；长期护理保险制度自 2000 年启动，明确把老年长期照护从家庭孤立负担转为"由社会整体支撑"的问题。这里的关键是制度动作：把人会老、会病、会需要照护这件事，提前写成公共责任。
Japan's universal health coverage is grounded in mandatory public insurance, and its long-term care insurance system launched in 2000 to shift elder care from isolated family burden toward care supported by society as a whole.
因此，日本给 HPRP 的启发不是"复制日本"，而是：一个成熟社会必须让普通人的脆弱可被制度承接。
Therefore, Japan's lesson for HPRP is not "copy Japan," but this: a mature society must make ordinary vulnerability institutionally holdable.
《自我学》V1.3 确立了一条硬原则：撒谎不是主权的行使。感受主权不保护蓄意伪造的感受陈述。HPRP 继承这条原则，并将其转化为机构设计层的要求——不可读的规则是欺诈的温床；没有反欺诈机制的公共系统，会让撒谎者用主权语言压制受害者。因此，规则可读性与反欺诈机制必须被焊接在一起。
Self Studies V1.3 established a hard principle: lying is not the exercise of sovereignty. HPRP inherits this principle and translates it into institutional design requirements — unreadable rules are breeding grounds for fraud; public systems without anti-fraud mechanisms allow liars to use sovereignty language to suppress victims.
不可读的规则制造依附、求人、潜规则和羞辱——也制造撒谎的机会。当规则清晰、路径明确、失败后仍可再次进入时，一个人不需要通过撒谎来获得通行。当撒谎发生，明规则系统必须有能力依据独立可核验的事实进行仲裁，而不是依赖地位、关系或权力。
Unreadable rules produce dependency, begging, hidden rules, and humiliation — and they also create opportunities for lying. When rules are clear, pathways are explicit, and re-entry after failure is possible, a person does not need to lie to gain passage.
因此，HPRP 要求每一个工具、协议、制度安放节点都必须同时满足两个条件：① 普通人读得懂入口和路径；② 系统内置了基于事实基础而非地位的反欺诈校验机制。
Therefore, HPRP requires that every tool, protocol, and institutional placement node must simultaneously satisfy two conditions: ① ordinary people can read the entry points and pathways; ② the system has built-in anti-fraud verification based on factual basis, not on status.
HPRP-F2 不得被单独引用为“弱势方永远正确”。弱势不是事实证明，强势不是有罪证明。结构位置校正只在事实基础未被推翻、事实仍待查、或事实相当时启动。
HPRP-F2 may not be cited alone to mean “the vulnerable party is always right.” Vulnerability is not proof, and power is not guilt.
《自我学》V1.3 建立了主权冲突仲裁原则：优先保护有独立可核验事实基础且处于结构中更弱势一方的主权。HPRP 将这一原则机构化——不是作为道德呼吁，而是作为制度安放层的设计要求。任何一个接住人的公共系统，都必须预装这一仲裁机制。
Self Studies V1.3 established the sovereignty conflict arbitration principle. HPRP institutionalizes this principle — not as a moral appeal, but as a design requirement for the institutional placement layer. Any public system that holds people must pre-install this arbitration mechanism.
每一个 HPRP 协议节点（庇护、身份恢复、健康、收入、关系、尊严）必须预留一个"冲突报告与仲裁"入口。当主权声称冲突发生时，该入口启动，而非直接升级为惩罚或驱逐。
Every HPRP protocol node must reserve a "conflict report and arbitration" entry. When sovereignty claims collide, the entry activates — not escalating directly to punishment or expulsion.
仲裁者必须有排序地评估：① 事实基础——是否有独立于声称者的可核验证据；② 结构位置——双方在权力、信息、资源上的不对等程度。两项判准必须同时被记录和公开。
Arbitrators must assess in order: ① factual basis; ② structural position. Both criteria must be recorded and disclosed.
仲裁结果不是惩罚，而是恢复。被侵犯的主权需要被恢复。侵犯方若愿意纠正，应保留返回路径，不被永久放逐。但明知故犯的欺诈行为需承担相应后果，且后果必须预先明文规定。
The outcome of arbitration is not punishment, but restoration. If the violator is willing to correct, return pathways should be preserved. But deliberate fraud carries specified consequences.
任何提起仲裁的人，不得因此被降低服务质量、取消资格或遭受隐性惩罚。制度必须将"提起仲裁"与"服务资格"完全解耦。报复行为本身成为新的仲裁案件。
Anyone who initiates arbitration must not face reduced service quality or hidden punishment. Retaliation itself becomes a new arbitration case.
此自评表不是诊断工具，不用于决定一个人是否有资格获得帮助。它用于帮助个人和外展工作者快速定位"哪一层首先需要被接住"。系统不得以"主权容量不足"为由拒绝提供服务——恰恰相反，低容量意味着更需要被接住。
This self-assessment is not a diagnostic tool and is not used to determine eligibility for help. The system must not deny services on grounds of "low sovereignty capacity" — on the contrary, low capacity means greater need to be held.
V1.1 保留 V1.0 的目标，并进一步补入操作流与同意安全层不是继续赞美 HPRP 的理念，而是修复它进入机构执行时最危险的漏洞：事实基础与结构位置的排序、欺诈举证责任、禁止报复的反向滥用、恢复优先的累犯风险、自评表的数据滥用、规则透明与钻空子的张力、以及仲裁者本身的问责。
V1.1 preserves the V1.0 abuse-resistance lock and further adds operational flow and consent safety. It does not praise the ideal. It repairs the risks that appear when HPRP enters institutions: priority order between factual basis and structural position, burden of proof for fraud, weaponized anti-retaliation, repeated abuse of restoration pathways, data misuse, readable rules versus gaming, and accountability of arbitrators.
HPRP-F1 优先于 HPRP-F2。事实基础决定是否发生、是否成立；结构位置校正只在事实基础未被推翻、事实仍待查、或事实相当时启动，用于决定保护、恢复与资源配置。HPRP-F2 不得被单独引用为“弱势方永远正确”；弱势不是事实证明，强势不是有罪证明。
HPRP-F1 takes priority over HPRP-F2. Factual basis determines whether an event occurred or whether a claim is established. Structural-position correction activates only when factual basis has not been disproven, remains under investigation, or is materially balanced. Vulnerability is not proof, and power is not guilt.
混乱、迟疑、创伤性记忆不全、表达不稳、材料缺失、低识字能力、语言障碍或行政不熟悉，不自动构成欺诈。欺诈成立须同时满足三项：① 存在可核验的虚假陈述或伪造行为；② 该虚假陈述对资源、资格、权利或他人主权造成实质影响；③ 有合理证据显示行为人明知其虚假而仍主动使用。
Confusion, hesitation, trauma-related memory gaps, unstable expression, missing documents, low literacy, language barriers, or administrative unfamiliarity do not automatically constitute fraud. Fraud requires verifiable falsehood/forgery, material impact, and reasonable evidence that the actor knowingly used it.
“同时评估”必须改成“有排序地记录”：先 HPRP-F1，再 HPRP-F2。禁止用“综合判断”掩盖事实与结构位置的排序。
“Simultaneous assessment” must become ordered recording: first HPRP-F1, then HPRP-F2. No vague “overall judgment.”
同一主体在无新事实、无新证据、无新伤害的情况下重复提交同类仲裁三次以上，或以仲裁拖延、威胁、骚扰，可暂停重复事项受理，保留一次独立复核入口。
More than three repeated filings without new facts, evidence, or harm, or arbitration used for delay/threat/harassment, triggers a pause of repeated matters while preserving one independent review channel.
恢复优先不等于无限容忍。初犯低伤害错误补正即可；可核验欺诈进入监督修正；累犯进入限制；暴力与直接危险以受害者安全为第一前提。
Restoration first is not infinite tolerance: correct low-harm first-time errors; monitor verifiable fraud; restrict repeated abuse; prioritize victim safety in violence/direct danger.
六维主权容量自评只可用于自我理解、服务适配与支持强度调整；不得用于资格筛选、降低优先级、惩罚、风险标签、永久档案、算法评分或服务拒绝。低容量只能触发更多支持。
The six-dimensional self-assessment may only support self-understanding and service adaptation. It cannot screen eligibility, lower priority, punish, label risk, create permanent files, score algorithmically, or deny service. Low capacity only triggers more support.
公开入口、权利、义务、流程、申诉路径、证据类型与基本判断标准；不公开可被精准规避的风控参数、抽查逻辑、反欺诈触发阈值或内部安全策略。
Publish entry, rights, duties, processes, appeals, evidence types, and basic standards; do not publish risk parameters, random-check logic, anti-fraud triggers, or internal safety strategy.
仲裁者不被预设为中立。中立性必须通过记录、回避、复核、外部申诉与模式审计被持续制造。仲裁者本人亦可成为 HPRP-ARB 案件对象。
Arbitrators are not presumed neutral. Neutrality is produced through records, recusal, review, external appeal, and pattern audit. Arbitrators themselves may become HPRP-ARB case subjects.
HPRP 全文引用必须使用完整命名空间：HPRP-F、HPRP-ARB、SS-AX、SS-ARB、SS-SOV、SS-AF。跨文档引用时必须写明来源系统与条款编号，避免 Self Studies 与 HPRP 编号互撞。
All references must use full namespaces: HPRP-F, HPRP-ARB, SS-AX, SS-ARB, SS-SOV, SS-AF. Cross-document references must specify source system and clause number.
HPRP-F1 > HPRP-F2 是全协议的机构安全阀。没有它，HPRP 会滑向“结构身份替代事实”；有了它，HPRP 才能同时防止撒谎者用主权语言压制受害者，也防止机构用反欺诈之名碾压真实弱者。
HPRP-F1 > HPRP-F2 is the safety valve of the protocol. Without it, structural identity replaces facts; with it, HPRP blocks both liars weaponizing sovereignty and institutions weaponizing anti-fraud against real vulnerable people.
V1.1 新增操作流图：每一个案例先经过风险分流，再决定进入普通修复路径、仲裁路径、机构安放路径或紧急安全路径。这样 HPRP 不会把所有问题都交给理论，而是把问题送到正确的行动轨道。
V1.1 adds an operational flow: every case first goes through risk triage, then routes into repair, arbitration, institutional placement, or emergency safety pathways.
记录发生了什么、谁受影响、是否有可识别个人信息。
Record what happened, who is affected, and whether identifiable information exists.
判断是否涉及暴力、儿童/老人、家暴、严重医疗或紧急危险。
Check for violence, child/elder risk, domestic violence, severe medical risk, or emergency danger.
归入七种失安放类型之一或多种交叉类型。
Classify into one or more of the seven displacement types.
识别庇护、规则可读性、承认、返回路径、节律修复的失灵点。
Identify failure points in shelter, rule readability, recognition, return pathways, and rhythm repair.
匹配清单、导航卡、问卷、地图、风险表、转介路径。
Match checklists, navigation cards, questionnaires, maps, risk sheets, and referrals.
若有事实争议、主权冲突、欺诈指控，进入 HPRP-ARB。
If factual dispute, sovereignty conflict, or fraud allegation appears, enter HPRP-ARB.
把工具放进学校、NGO、社区、城市、机构流程。
Embed tools into schools, NGOs, communities, city systems, and institutional workflows.
形成可被公共系统采纳的政策语言与试点建议。
Produce policy language and pilot proposals that public systems can adopt.
Repair Path无争议、无紧急危险，直接进入工具和支持。Arbitration Path涉及事实争议、主权冲突、欺诈指控，进入 HPRP-ARB。Emergency Safety Path涉及暴力、直接危险、儿童/老人/家暴/严重医疗风险，先进入安全转介，不等待理论处理。
Repair PathNo dispute or emergency danger: go directly to tools and support. Arbitration PathFactual disputes, sovereignty conflicts, or fraud allegations: enter HPRP-ARB. Emergency Safety PathViolence, direct danger, child/elder/domestic violence/medical risk: safety referral first.
HPRP 的公共行动层必须承认：理论、命名、机制分析不能替代紧急保护。风险分流层用于防止 HPRP 被误用成“所有事都先讨论”。
HPRP must acknowledge that theory, naming, and mechanism analysis cannot replace urgent protection. Risk triage prevents HPRP from becoming “discuss everything first.”
无直接危险，可进入 Case Lab：类型判定、机制诊断、工具匹配、政策转译。
No direct danger: enter Case Lab for classification, diagnosis, tool matching, and policy translation.
低主权容量、低资源、低规则可读性；优先支持，但不贴负面标签。
Low sovereignty capacity, resources, or rule readability; prioritize support without negative labels.
家暴、跟踪、威胁、照护失控、可预见伤害；先做安全计划与专业转介。
Domestic violence, stalking, threats, care collapse, foreseeable harm; safety planning and referral first.
即时暴力、自伤/他伤、儿童/老人严重风险、急性医疗危机；立即联系当地紧急服务、热线、医疗/法律支持。
Immediate violence, self/other-harm, child/elder severe risk, acute medical crisis; contact local emergency, hotline, medical/legal support.
V1.1 把“居民、被保护者、自由主体、见证者、建设者”的伦理钉位翻译成可执行边界：谁可以做什么，谁不可以被要求做什么。
V1.1 translates the five identities into operational boundaries: what each role may do, and what they must not be forced to do.
这一层保护新世界群、见证者、当事人与外部案例。微信群内容默认不是公开材料；公共行动必须从同意、匿名化和最小必要信息开始。
This layer protects the New World circle, witnesses, involved persons, and external cases. Group-chat content is not public material by default.
新世界群内容默认不是公开材料；未经明确同意，不进入网站、论文、演讲、社交媒体。
New World circle content is not public by default; without explicit consent, it does not enter websites, papers, talks, or social media.
删除姓名、地点、截图、头像、时间戳、关系链和可反推身份的细节。
Remove names, locations, screenshots, avatars, timestamps, relation chains, and re-identifiable details.
HPRP 使用个案是为了提取机制和工具需求，不消费创伤叙事。
HPRP uses cases to extract mechanisms and tool needs, not to consume trauma narratives.
当事人或见证者可要求撤回、修改、模糊化、删除相关内容。
The involved person or witness may request withdrawal, revision, masking, or deletion.
涉及家暴、未成年人、移民身份、医疗、精神危机、法律风险时，只做类型化，不展示细节。
Domestic violence, minors, immigration status, medical, mental crisis, legal risk: type-level only, no detail display.
只收集完成修复、转介或机制分析所必需的信息。
Collect only information necessary for repair, referral, or mechanism analysis.
V1.1 建立未来模块地图，让七种失安放不只停留在分类，而有对应的工具、协议与试点位置。
V1.1 establishes a future module map so the seven displacement types become tools, protocols, and pilots — not only categories.
Shelter Return Kit、庇护回归栈、无房统计与去刑事化路径。
Shelter Return Kit, shelter-return stack, homelessness counting and decriminalization pathways.
物业/邻里/地方潜规则导航卡，规则可读性与反黑箱工具。
Property/neighborhood/local hidden-rule navigation card and anti-black-box tools.
家暴、控制型家庭、原生家庭压迫、家庭内主权边界工具。
Domestic violence, coercive families, family-sovereignty boundary tools.
国际学生/移民/外地人就医、签证、学校与城市承认入口。
Healthcare, visa, school and city recognition entries for international students, migrants, outsiders.
职场剥削、签证绑定、医保绑定、过劳与身体节律修复。
Work exploitation, visa/insurance dependency, overwork and body-rhythm repair.
亲密关系、朋友关系、共真资格、边界和修复路径。
Intimate/friend relationships, co-truth status, boundaries and repair pathways.
资源进入资产系统，但人未进入承认系统；规则地图、资产伦理与地方承认。
Resources enter asset systems, but the person remains outside recognition systems.
HPRP 进入公共行动之后，必须不断区分：哪些是正典结构，哪些只是系统内语义，哪些需要证据、合作机构和法律审查。
Once HPRP enters public action, it must distinguish canonical structure, internal symbolic grammar, and items requiring evidence, partners, and legal review.
V1.1 的工作不是增加更多宏大概念，而是把 HPRP 从“丰富的网站”升级为“公共协议系统”：能进入案例、能分流风险、能保护同意、能防止仲裁被滥用、能把模块推向真实机构。
V1.1 upgrades HPRP from a rich website into a public protocol system: capable of case intake, risk triage, consent protection, abuse-resistant arbitration, and institutional module development.
HPRP 不是一个孤立的倡导项目。它是 xingyeLing7Ai 工作系统中的公共行动节点——把 BCI-HRP、Vibration Epistemology、QDR Engine、PCR-QR、振动即存在等承重件，从内层认识论与个体节律层延伸到外层的社会结构层。
HPRP is not an isolated advocacy project. It is the public-action node of the xingyeLing7Ai working system.
街头长期生存 = 持续 PTSD + 解离 + 睡眠崩溃 + 节律断裂。BCI-HRP 的 QDR Engine 与 Neural Cuff 协议（427Hz 锚位）在理论上可以在 shelter / drop-in center 中做 field test。
Long-term street survival = sustained PTSD + dissociation + sleep collapse + rhythm fracture. BCI-HRP's QDR Engine and Neural Cuff protocols can theoretically be field-tested in shelters.
所有七种失安放共享同一个底层结构：Qualia 承认权被系统性剥夺。Vibration Epistemology 的对称化操作把"未被官方承认的人"和"已被官方承认的人"放在同一认识论位置。
All seven displacement types share one bottom structure: Qualia recognition rights systemically stripped. Vibration Epistemology's symmetrization places all persons at the same epistemic position.
《自我学》V1.3 的"主权冲突仲裁原则"在 HPRP V1.1 中被机构化为四个设计要点：仲裁入口、有排序的有排序的双重判准、分级恢复轨道、禁止报复、举证责任、熔断机制、仲裁者问责、数据防滥用。六维主权容量自评表将"主权容量"概念操作化为可用的工具原型。
Self Studies V1.3's arbitration principle is institutionalized in HPRP V1.1 as four design points. The six-dimension sovereignty capacity self-assessment operationalizes "sovereignty capacity" into a usable tool prototype.
反欺诈条款的系统性应用：不可读的规则滋生欺诈，明规则 + 基于事实的校验机制 = 规则可读性与反欺诈的焊接。HPRP V1.1 要求每个协议节点都预装这一焊接，并锁定 HPRP-F1 > HPRP-F2。
Systemic application of the anti-fraud provision: unreadable rules breed fraud; public rules + fact-based verification = the weld of rule readability and anti-fraud.